A slight competition between transit and human consumption.
That’s how Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, an official with the Panama Canal Authority, described a possible water crunch in the region as a historic drought threatens the trade route he oversees.
Although the canal connects two oceans, its operation depends upon fresh water from a nearby lake, which has been dwindling during a 20-year drought. As a result, there is not as much water for vessels to sail through — or for local communities to drink.
In August, the average wait time for ships went from less than a week to nearly a week and a half, creating a bottleneck. At one point more than 160 ships were hanging out waiting for a Panama official to swipe right.
Today that number is down, but part of the relief came from using more fresh water.
Did I mention the region is experiencing a 20-year drought?
It’s similar to the two-decade drought that has choked the Colorado River and left Nevada’s Lake Mead at 34% of capacity.
Except this lake in Panama is key for global supply chains — as if they need one more problem. The pandemic’s effect on the supply chain was a major contributor to last year’s spike in inflation worldwide. The canal sees roughly 40% of global cargo ship traffic. I wonder what’s going to happen to prices if Panama doesn’t get more rain soon?
I also wonder what’s going to happen to the local residents facing a “slight competition” for fresh water.
According to NASA, this summer was the hottest on record. Last month was the fifth straight in which ocean temperatures set record highs. The United Nations estimates that the increase in natural disasters displaces more than 20 million people worldwide each year.
Evidence of human influence on climate change is so pronounced even Fox News moderators brought it up during the first debate of the Republican presidential primary season.
Sadly Vivek Ramaswamy provided the most memorable response: “The climate change agenda is a hoax.”
What’s even sadder is he got a bump in the polls afterward.
Meanwhile Panama officials plan to spend $2 billion to redirect more rivers toward the man-made lake to supply the man-made canal. We’re changing the Earth and the atmosphere.
The 50 million gallons of fresh water used to fill the locks of the canal are lost to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The fresh water sources involved with moving the vessels also supply drinking water for half the country. And diverting water will have repercussions on the ecosystem, if anyone still cares about that sort of thing.
In the meantime, Panama is expected to lose out on tens of millions of dollars in revenue because of the bottleneck.
Two out of every three ships that use the canal are connected to the U.S. economy. It’s the cheapest way to move grain and other food supplies.
There are no easy answers. But it is a problem the U.S. helped create, and too many powerful people in the U.S. are still making it worse. The climate change deniers in Congress and in the Republican presidential field would be at the top of that list.
Our economy has a direct effect on how fresh water is used in Panama. And remember, it wasn’t just American ingenuity that built the canal, but also American imperialism. Not until 1999 did we relinquish control.
Now changes in the climate — ones that U.S. industrialization and consumption fueled — may trigger a “slight competition” between transit and human consumption.
I’m not saying the answers are easy to find. But the least we can do is elect leaders who acknowledge we are part of the problem.
LZ Granderson is a Los Angeles Times columnist. ©2023 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.
Opinion: California can lead nation with a public option for health insurance
Opinion: Coercion for mentally ill can also be a form of compassion
Opinion: Women’s reproductive freedom is moving backward. Almost weekly
Opinion: As 2024 approaches, where has all the left-wing money gone?
Barabak: What voters in McCarthy’s district think about impeachment effort